My LeftValues result: Council Communism.
| Value | % | Value | % | Leaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revolution | 63.2 | Reform | 36.8 | Revolutionary |
| Scientific | 63.2 | Utopian | 36.8 | Scientific |
| Central | 38.3 | Decentral | 61.7 | Decentralist |
| International | 75.0 | National | 25.0 | Internationalist |
| Party | 52.1 | Union | 47.9 | Neutral |
| Production | 34.7 | Nature | 65.3 | Ecological |
| Conservative | 35.9 | Progressive | 64.1 | Progressive |
Going down the rabbit hole of leftwing tendencies is enlightening. Before today, I didn’t know what council communism or who Anton Pannekoek was, but ultimately it is an exercise in futility. The left fractures, and the reactionaries cohere much more easily. The project of keeping things the same or traditional lends itself to cohesion, whereas radicals and people for change have their own ideas of the future and readings of the past of what went wrong and right.
I’ve been thinking about this tension within the concept of a vanguard party, espoused by Marxist-Leninists, or dual power and mutual aid groups, preferred by anarchists. I’ve historically though myself more in favor of decentralization, but when confronted with the problem of climate change, perhaps a centralized project is worth considering.